Henri Fantin-Latour (1836–1904) is celebrated for still lifes—especially flower paintings. “Chrysanthemums” is a title collectors encounter in more than one format: museum-held originals, period prints, and later decorative reproductions.
The fastest path to an accurate value range is to document what you actually have: original painting vs. lithograph vs. modern reproduction. In Fantin-Latour’s market, those categories can mean the difference between a <$100 décor print and a five-figure-plus work.
This migration rewrites a legacy “appraisal report” post into a practical guide: how to spot a plate-signed lithograph, what to photograph, which condition issues matter, and how recent auction results help anchor a value estimate.
Two-step intake
Share your Fantin-Latour “Chrysanthemums” details with an expert
Send a photo of the full artwork plus close-ups of the signature area, margins, and paper/canvas texture. We’ll confirm the likely format (original vs. lithograph vs. reproduction) and give a market-ready value range.
We store your intake securely, sync it with the Appraisily CRM, and redirect you to checkout to reserve your slot.
Appraisal value: what Fantin-Latour “Chrysanthemums” prints typically sell for
The legacy post behind this migration described a plate-signed lithograph (signature printed as part of the image) rather than a hand-signed, numbered fine-art edition. For that common scenario, a practical working range is:
- $60–$150 for an unframed decorative print in clean condition
- $125–$350 for a nicely framed example (assuming the frame does not hide heavy foxing or toning)
Values move up when the print is a documented limited edition (signed and numbered, with publisher marks) and move down quickly when the paper is stained, trimmed, or heavily foxed.
If what you have is an original oil painting by Fantin-Latour (rare for most households), you are in a different market entirely. Don’t rely on “print” pricing until you confirm the medium.
What you actually have: original painting vs. lithograph vs. later reproduction
The title “Chrysanthemums” gets applied to multiple images. Use these fast checks to sort the object into the right category:
- Original oil painting: visible brushstrokes, varied surface texture, and canvas weave that changes with the paint. Under raking light, highlights and shadows move across the surface.
- Period lithograph / fine-art print: ink sits on paper, not as raised paint. Under magnification you may see litho crayon grain, plate tone, and deliberate printing characteristics.
- Later reproduction (offset/photomechanical): very even surface and modern dot patterns under magnification. Many décor prints are made from photographs of paintings and are not collectible in the same way.
If you’re unsure, photograph the surface at an angle with side lighting. That single photo often reveals whether you’re looking at ink on paper or paint on canvas.
Signature clues: hand-signed vs. “signed in plate”
Fantin-Latour prints often show a signature that looks convincing at first glance. The key question is whether it’s actually applied by hand.
- Hand-signed: usually in graphite pencil or ink in a margin, with pressure variation and tiny skips in the line.
- Signed in plate: printed within the image area, perfectly flat, and identical across impressions. This is common on reproduction lithographs.
A plate signature is not “fake”—it’s just not a hand autograph. Market pricing is typically closer to decorative-print territory unless the edition itself is clearly documented.
Printmaking clues: lithograph vs. offset reproduction
If you’ve established it’s a print on paper, one more step improves pricing accuracy: identifying whether it’s a true lithograph or a later offset reproduction.
- Offset dots: under a loupe, modern reproductions often show CMYK dot patterns (tiny colored dots creating the image).
- Lithograph grain: true lithographs can show a crayon-like texture and more organic grain in the ink.
- Margins and marks: look for an edition fraction (e.g., 12/200), a title, a publisher/printer blindstamp, or a watermark.
For many family-inherited “Chrysanthemums” pieces, the absence of edition markings and the presence of a plate signature points to a decorative reproduction.
Condition issues that commonly lower value
Prints are highly condition-sensitive, especially around the margins. A clean-looking front can still hide significant issues under the mat.
- Foxing: brown speckles caused by moisture/age (often worst in margins).
- Toning: overall yellowing of paper, especially on cheaper stocks.
- Mat burn / acid burn: a darker line where old mat board touched the sheet.
- Creases and edge tears: common on prints that were stored rolled or moved between frames.
- Trimming: cut margins can remove any identifying marks and reduce collector interest.
If you plan to sell, avoid “cleaning” the paper yourself—well-meaning cleaning attempts can create stains that are worse than the original issue.
What photos to take (fastest path to an accurate value)
- Full front shot, straight-on (include the frame edges if framed)
- Close-up of the signature area (include surrounding texture)
- Close-up of all four corners/margins (look for foxing, tears, or trimmed edges)
- Raking-light close-up (side-lit) to reveal texture
- Back of frame / backing paper (labels, stamps, and frame shop notes)
- Any paperwork (receipt, prior appraisal, gallery info)
Recent auction comps that anchor a Fantin-Latour value range
Auction results help set expectations. Even when the exact “Chrysanthemums” image doesn’t appear in recent datasets, comparable Fantin-Latour flower works show the gap between originals, lithographs, and illustrated-livre lithography.
- Bonhams (14 Mar 2018), lot 39: “Roses” (oil on canvas) realized £248,750. This illustrates the market for authenticated Fantin-Latour originals.
- Grant Zahajko Auctions (4 Dec 2024), lot 67: “Henri Fantin-Latour Lithograph” realized $275, closer to the range most framed decorative lithographs land in.
- Artcurial (26 Mar 2024), lot 78: André Chénier’s Les Bucoliques with multiple original lithographs by Fantin-Latour realized €2,200, showing how documented, limited lithographic work commands a premium.
The practical takeaway: if your piece is a plate-signed, unnumbered lithograph/reproduction, price it like a framed print. If it is a signed/numbered edition with publisher marks, the market can be meaningfully higher. If it’s an original painting, treat it as fine art and use a specialist.
How to sell a Fantin-Latour “Chrysanthemums” print
Choose a channel that matches what you have:
- Decorative prints: marketplaces (eBay/Etsy) work well if you disclose dimensions, framing, and condition clearly.
- Signed/numbered editions: consider a print dealer, a gallery, or an auction house that can catalogue the edition.
- Original paintings: contact a reputable fine-art auction specialist. Don’t remove old labels or restorations—document everything first.
Packing note: ship framed works with corner protection and padding to prevent glass damage. For unframed prints, ship flat between rigid boards when possible; if you must roll, use acid-free interleaving and a wide tube.
Search variations collectors ask
Readers often Google these questions while researching Fantin-Latour “Chrysanthemums” prints:
- How much is a Henri Fantin-Latour “Chrysanthemums” lithograph worth?
- How can I tell if a Fantin-Latour signature is printed in the plate?
- Is my “Chrysanthemums” an original painting or a reproduction?
- What does “signed in plate” mean on a French lithograph?
- Does foxing in the margins lower lithograph value?
- What photos do I need for an art print appraisal?
- Where is the best place to sell a Fantin-Latour flower print?
- How do edition numbers and blindstamps affect print pricing?
- Are Fantin-Latour flower paintings always high value?
Each question maps to the identification, authentication, and selling guidance above.
References
- Appraisily legacy appraisal record (WordPress post ID 13014) for “Chrysanthemums - Henri Fantin Latour” (migration source).
- Bonhams comp source:
/mnt/srv-storage/scrapper-db-data/data/chawan/page_0064.json(lot 39, 2018-03-14). - Print comp source:
/mnt/srv-storage/scrapper-db-data/data/photographs/page_0136.json(lot 67, 2024-12-04). - Illustrated-livre comp source:
/mnt/srv-storage/scrapper-db-data/data/bas-relief/page_0035.json(lot 78, 2024-03-26).
Wrap-up
For most inherited Fantin-Latour “Chrysanthemums” pieces, value is driven by one decision: original vs. print. Document the surface texture, the signature area (hand-signed vs. plate-signed), and the margins. Once you confirm the format, you can price the work using recent comps, disclose condition honestly, and choose the right selling channel.