620a6e673b7b2 6

Antiques and art appraisals work best when process is as rigorous as connoisseurship. The shorthand “620a6e673b7b2 6” in this guide refers to a six-factor protocol built for field use by collectors, dealers, and valuation pros. It organizes identification, provenance, condition, market analysis, and risk into a repeatable method you can apply to furniture, decorative arts, fine art, prints, and more.

The goal: a defensible opinion of value, aligned with the appraisal purpose (insurance, donation, estate, resale), backed by verifiable evidence.

Decoding “620a6e673b7b2 6”: A Six-Factor Appraisal Protocol

The six factors:

1. Identification: Precisely what is it? Medium, maker, period, technique, dimensions, distinctive features.
2. Provenance: Who owned it, where, how, and with what documentation.
3. Condition: Stability, wear, restorations, losses; how it affects value.
4. Conservation context: What treatments were done or needed; reversibility and costs.
5. Market analysis: Appropriate comparables, venue dynamics, timing, and value type.
6. Risk management: Authentication gaps, title and cultural-property issues, logistics, and conflict checks.

Applied in sequence, these steps reduce bias, clarify uncertainty, and produce consistent reports.

Factors 1–2: Identification and Provenance

Identification is the foundation. Errors here cascade through value and risk.

• Object data: Record standardized measurements (H x W x D), including frame or mount details. Note metric and imperial. Weigh when relevant (bronze, silver, clocks).
• Materials and technique: Distinguish oil vs. acrylic, wood species and construction (dovetails, saw marks), porcelain vs. earthenware, cast vs. carved. For prints, identify process (etching, lithograph, woodcut), state, and edition.
• Inscribed information: Capture exact signatures, dedications, edition numbers, foundry marks, hallmarks, maker’s stamps, retailer labels, inventory stickers. Photograph macro details in consistent light.
• Stylistic and construction cues: For furniture, examine joinery, tool marks, screw types, veneers, secondary woods, and oxidation patterns. For bronzes, look for foundry seals and cold vs. hot patination. For silver, decode hallmark systems by country and period; note assay marks and date letters. For paintings, check canvas weave, stretcher type, ground layer, and craquelure pattern.
• Cataloguing: Use consistent titling conventions (Artist Last, First; Title; date or circa; medium; dimensions; signature location). Include an object ID and a brief descriptive abstract.

Provenance verifies legitimacy, informs dating, and can raise value dramatically.

• Construct a chain of custody: From creation or earliest traceable ownership through to present. List owners, acquisition methods (auction, dealer, inheritance), dates, and locations.
• Documentation types: Bills of sale, gallery labels, auction catalog entries, inventory cards, correspondence, published illustrations, exhibition checklists, conservation reports, import/export paperwork, and certificates of authenticity.
• Red flags: Vague “private collection” entries with gaps; unverifiable COAs; dealers who will not confirm invoices; inconsistent labels; suspiciously perfect stories.
• Strength tests: Independent confirmation from catalogues raisonnés, exhibition histories, artist estates, or archives. Corroborating labels that match documented shows. References in scholarly literature.
• Contextual impact: Prestigious ownership, significant exhibitions, or publication can justify premiums. Conversely, troubled histories (restitutions unresolved, looted-object concerns) may impair saleability or legality.

When provenance is thin, state uncertainties clearly and adjust risk and value accordingly.

Factors 3–4: Condition and Conservation

Condition affects both marketability and choice of value approach. Record it methodically.

• Examination techniques: Inspect under raking light to reveal planar deformations, craquelure, and fills. Use UV to detect overpaint, varnish fluorescence, or modern adhesives. For works on paper, backlight to see watermarks, chain lines, and repairs. A 10x loupe is indispensable.
• Typical condition variables:
  • Paintings: Craquelure type and activity, cleavages, inpainting, relining, stretcher bar marks, surface abrasion, yellowed varnish, moisture damage.
  • Works on paper: Foxing, toning, mat burn, creases, tears, hinge remnants, trimmed margins, offsetting, paper acidity.
  • Sculpture and objects: Patina integrity, corrosion, casting flaws, breaks and solder joins, missing elements, wood splits and worming, glaze crazing vs. true cracks.
  • Furniture: Structural stability, replaced feet/handles, refinishing extent, veneer lifts, split panels, later screws.
  • Silver and jewelry: Overpolishing loss of crispness, dents, resoldered joints, replaced stones, fatigued prongs.
• Restoration assessment: Identify materials and reversibility. Professional, reversible treatments often stabilize value; crude or irreversible repairs (overcleaning, aggressive polishing, epoxy fills) can depress it substantially.
• Conservation needs and costs: Estimate pragmatic treatment plans (e.g., surface clean and revarnish vs. full structural consolidation). Note risks and likely value uplift post-treatment. For insurance values, specify current vs. post-treatment conditions as needed.

Document with a structured condition report: overall summary, detailed observations by area, photos annotated with locations, and treatment history if known.

Factors 5–6: Market Analysis and Risk Management

Valuation is purpose-driven. The same object can carry different values depending on the intended use of the appraisal.

Value definitions to apply appropriately:

• Fair Market Value (FMV): Price between willing buyer and seller, neither under compulsion, with reasonable knowledge, usually for tax and estate contexts.
• Retail Replacement Value (RRV): Cost to replace with a like item in the retail market, often for insurance scheduling.
• Orderly liquidation or forced sale values: Used in insolvency or expedited sale scenarios.

Selecting comparables:

• Relevance: Same artist/maker, medium, size/scale, date/period, edition/series, subject, and condition. For decorative arts, same model or closely related variants and materials.
• Venue: Align comps with the market level of your subject—primary retail, dealer secondary, or auction. Note private-treaty vs. public results.
• Adjustments: Normalize for buyer’s premium, currency, taxes, and fees; adjust for condition differences, framing, and provenance premiums. Size adjustments should be conservative and non-linear.
• Timeliness: Use recent sales in comparable market conditions; older comps may require trend adjustments. Recognize seasonal cycles and market volatility for certain categories.

Interpreting the data:

• Price bands and medians are more informative than outliers. Explain why a comp is included or excluded.
• Report a value conclusion as a well-justified range when uncertainty is non-trivial; specify midpoint logic if a single figure is required by the assignment.

Risk management:

• Authentication risk: Absence of inclusion in a catalog raisonné (when one exists) is a material risk. If an artist’s estate or authentication committee offers opinions, state the status. Beware of forged COAs and embellished provenance.
• Title and legal risks: Confirm seller’s right to sell. Screen for cultural-property restrictions, export controls, and wildlife regulations (e.g., ivory components). For archaeological material, validate licit origin and compliance with applicable laws.
• Restitution and sanctions: Investigate 1933–1945 provenance for European art at risk of wartime looting. Screen against embargoed or sanctioned entities where relevant.
• Conflicts and independence: Disclose prior involvement with the object, financial interests, or contingent fee structures that could bias value conclusions.
• Logistics and insurance: For high-value items, specify packing, climate, and transit risks. Recommend appropriate coverage types and limits.

Reporting standards: For formal appraisals, align with recognized standards for ethics, scope of work, and record-keeping. Include limiting conditions, assumptions, and the appraiser’s qualifications.

Practical Field Checklist

Use this concise list in the studio, shop, or saleroom.

• Assign an object ID; photograph overall and details (signatures, labels, condition issues).
• Measure precisely; record metric and imperial; note weight if relevant.
• Identify materials and technique; note construction details and tool marks.
• Transcribe signatures, edition numbers, hallmarks, and labels verbatim.
• Draft a clear title, maker/artist attribution with confidence level, date or circa.
• Capture provenance in order with dates, owners, and documents; flag gaps.
• Examine under raking light, UV, and with a loupe; log condition issues by area.
• Note any prior restorations and their quality; estimate necessary conservation.
• Define the appraisal purpose; select the correct value definition (FMV, RRV, etc.).
• Gather recent, relevant comparables; normalize for premiums, currency, and condition.
• Explain comp inclusion/exclusion; reconcile to a supported value or range.
• Screen for legal/ethical constraints (title, cultural property, wildlife materials).
• Disclose assumptions, limiting conditions, and your independence.
• Store workfiles: images, notes, comp data, and correspondence.

FAQ

Q: How do I handle uncertain attribution? A: Use tiered language (e.g., “by,” “attributed to,” “studio of,” “circle of,” “manner of”) consistent with category norms. Explain the evidence for and against stronger attribution, state remaining uncertainties, and reflect the risk in the value range. Avoid overreaching without primary-source support or recognized-expert opinion.

Q: What if provenance is incomplete? A: Present the known chain transparently, identify gaps, and seek corroboration (labels, invoices, exhibition records). Consider a conservative value stance or a wider range. If the gap intersects sensitive periods or regions, perform enhanced diligence for title or cultural-property issues.

Q: When should I recommend conservation before sale? A: Only when treatment is likely to be safe, reversible, and value-accretive relative to cost and time. Minor surface cleaning or proper framing often helps; invasive structural treatments near a sale window can introduce risk. For insurance appraisals, value in current condition unless the assignment specifies otherwise.

Q: How many comparables are enough? A: Quality beats quantity. Three to six strong, closely matched comps usually provide a sound basis. Include a few secondary comps if they illuminate the market’s breadth, but justify each selection and adjustment.

Q: Why do insurance values differ from auction prices? A: Insurance schedules use Retail Replacement Value—the cost to obtain a similar piece from the appropriate retail market today, which includes dealer overhead and time-to-replace factors. Auction prices reflect wholesale dynamics and may be lower, especially after seller commissions and fees.

This six-factor protocol keeps your appraisal practice disciplined and defensible. Treat each step as evidence-building, and let the record—not hope or habit—drive the number.