A Belgian Pewter Coal Of Arm Plate From Circa 19th Century

Antique pewter has a quiet authority: soft sheen, honest wear, and the sense of craft that steel-bright alloys never quite match. Among the most evocative pieces are armorial wall plates—often called “coat-of-arms plates.” You’ll sometimes see the phrase miswritten as “coal of arm”; the intent is the same. This guide focuses on identifying, dating, and valuing a Belgian pewter coat‑of‑arms plate from the 19th century, with practical pointers for appraisers and enthusiasts.

What You’re Looking At: Object Type and Context

A coat‑of‑arms plate is a decorative pewter plate cast or struck with heraldic imagery in the center well or on the cavetto, intended for wall display or occasional ceremonial use. Belgian examples often celebrate:

• Civic identity (city/provincial arms or emblems tied to local guilds and militias).
• Family arms for marriage or lineage pride.
• Commemorations: anniversaries of societies, civic office appointments, or patriotic events after Belgium’s independence in 1830.

Key background points:

• Alloy: Pewter is predominantly tin, historically with variable lead content and small amounts of antimony/copper. Continental 19th‑century pewter often contains some lead; “Britannia metal” (a harder, lead‑free tin‑antimony alloy) is more typical of British and Germanic production but overlaps in continental trade.
• Regulation: Pre‑Revolutionary guild control of pewter marking waned around the 1790s; in the 19th century, Belgian pewterers often used personal touchmarks, names, and generic “ETAIN/ETAIN FIN” stamps rather than strict guild assay marks.
• Language and heraldry: After 1830, Belgian pieces sometimes display bilingual elements (French and Dutch), though many provincial and city arms predate the state and remain monolingual.

Dimensions vary, but wall plates commonly run 22–32 cm (8.5–12.5 in) in diameter. Weight varies with alloy and thickness; expect a surprisingly hefty feel for the size compared to aluminum‑like souvenir repros.

How To Identify a 19th‑Century Belgian Pewter Armorial Plate

Examine construction first; it’s often more informative than the decoration.

1. Casting and finishing

• Plate body: Most Belgian plates were cast and then lathe‑finished. Look for concentric turning lines on the underside and sometimes faint lines in the well. Crisp, machine‑regular rings suggest later 19th‑century and early 20th‑century turning; looser, irregular rings lean earlier.
• Rim and booge: The booge (the sloped transition from center well to rim) on 19th‑century plates tends to be neat and even. Very thick, irregular rims often indicate 18th century, while extremely thin, sharply pressed rims can indicate later mass‑production.
• Foot ring: A modestly pronounced integral foot ring is typical; separately applied foot rings are less common on Belgian pewter of this type.

2. Surface and patina

• Patina: Expect a soft, medium‑to‑dark gray with gentle variations, occasionally woodsmoke‑toned if displayed near fireplaces historically. Beware uniformly bright, high‑shine surfaces—they usually indicate later polishing, recent manufacture, or non‑pewter alloys.
• Wear: Honest contact wear shows on the outer rim and center high points of the relief arms. Look for naturally smoother highlights on raised details and micro‑scratches radiating from hand polishing.

3. Relief and armorial work

• Depth and crispness: 19th‑century plates can have fairly sharp relief, but not razor‑crisp edges throughout; look for subtle rounding at peaks from age and dusting. Extremely crisp, sand‑blasted‑clean recesses and sharp knife‑like edges can indicate modern dies or recastings.
• Layout: Arms typically occupy the central medallion, often within a laurel, strapwork, or ribboned cartouche. Supporters, mantling, crests, and motto scrolls may appear, especially on plates celebrating civic or state arms.

4. Mounting clues

• Hanging holes: Small, hand‑drilled holes near the rim are common on period wall plates. Factory‑pressed holes or modern eyelets/screw rings are later.
• Backs: A smooth back with subtle turning lines is expected. Cast, pebbly backs are suspicious unless consistent with known workshop practices. Any modern felt pads or wire hangers are add‑ons and don’t date the piece.

5. Sound and heft

• Tap test: Pewter yields a dull thud rather than a ringing tone. If it rings brightly, suspect a harder, later alloy or non‑pewter metal.
• Heft: Genuine pewter feels dense for its volume, heavier than aluminum or zinc alloys often used in souvenir plates.

Belgian Marks and Heraldic Clues

Marks on 19th‑century Belgian pewter are inconsistent but still helpful.

Typical markings:

• Maker’s touchmark: A struck device, often in a small cartouche (oval/rectangular), may show initials, a name, or emblem. After guild dissolution, many pewterers used personalized stamps, sometimes with crowns, stars, or rosettes as decorative borders (these are not official hallmarks).
• Material marks: “ETAIN,” “ETAIN FIN,” or occasionally bilingual notations (e.g., “ETAIN/TIN”). Stated purity percentages such as “ETAIN 95%” are generally 20th century and usually post‑1950; treat them as a red flag if your piece is claimed 19th century.
• City or retailer stamps: Names of cities in French or Dutch (Bruxelles/Brussel, Liège/Luik, Anvers/Antwerpen, Namur/Namen, Gand/Gent, Tournai/Doornik) may indicate origin or a retailer, but not always manufacture.

Heraldry diagnostics:

• State vs. local arms: The national Belgian arms (post‑1830) feature a crowned lion rampant and the motto “L’union fait la force” (French) and/or “Eendracht maakt macht” (Dutch). Presence of this bilingual motto suggests post‑independence patriotic plates. Provincial/city arms are equally common: e.g., lion motifs for Flanders and Brabant, St. Michael for Brussels, a hand for Antwerp. Pin the identification down by matching central charges, supporters, crowns, and motto scrolls.
• Language and spelling: French-only mottoes and inscriptions can hint at early post‑independence or Francophone regions; Dutch-only inscriptions suggest Flemish origin. Bilingual pieces are common later in the 19th century and into the 20th.
• Personal arms: Marriage plates sometimes display impaled shields (two coats side-by-side on one shield) or dual shields under a shared crest; initials or a date in the field point to a commemorative context.

Reading marks and heraldry together is potent. For example, a plate marked “ETAIN FIN” with a Brussels retailer stamp and a central St. Michael motif plausibly sits mid‑to‑late 19th century; the same plate with “ETAIN 95%” would argue for later manufacture.

Dating, Authenticity, and Differentiating Reproductions

Dating within the 19th century relies on a bundle of clues:

• Pre‑1830 (late Southern Netherlands/United Kingdom of the Netherlands): Older turning style, possibly French‑influenced stamps; arms of provinces or cities without Belgian national symbolism.
• 1830–1870: Rise of commemoratives; patriotic motifs; French‑language dominance in many inscriptions; good but still hand‑inflected lathe work.
• 1870–1900: More standardized machine turning, sometimes finer repeated beading or rolled edges; retailer marks become more common; bilingual inscriptions begin to appear more frequently.

Spotting later reproductions:

• Alloy purity marks (e.g., 95%/97% tin) and standardized logos typically indicate 20th century.
• Hyper‑even surfaces, aggressive sparkle, and die‑sharp edges suggest recent casting. Modern sand-casting leaves a uniform granular texture in low relief that doesn’t match older hand‑tooled finishing.
• Tourist pieces often bear generic arms, oversized motto scrolls, and exaggerated contrast between matte fields and bright highlights. Many are German or Italian factory products with Belgian motifs, not Belgian manufacture.
• Screwed‑in hangers, protective lacquers, and high‑gloss finishes are almost always later.

When in doubt, a non‑destructive XRF (X‑ray fluorescence) test by a conservator or metals lab can profile the alloy and support dating. Avoid scratch or acid tests; they are unreliable and damaging.

Condition, Conservation, and Value Factors

Condition issues to expect:

• Dents and dings: Rim knocks from decades of display/handling. Minor dents are typical and acceptable; sharp creases reduce appeal.
• Pitting and corrosion: Small pits in the well and underside develop from moisture and acidic exposure. Deep, widespread pitting is more concerning.
• Solder repairs: Hairline cracks in rims occasionally reinforced with solder; check color match and workmanship.
• Hanging holes: One to three small drilled holes near the rim are not defects for wall plates; jagged, oversized or multiple amateur holes detract.
• Warping: Subtle warp is common; severe dish‑warp or twisting hurts value.
• Over‑polishing: The most common problem. Over‑buffed surfaces look unnaturally bright, with smeared detail and loss of crispness on relief. Original patina is highly prized.

Value drivers:

• Iconographic strength: Recognizable civic/provincial arms, crisp armorial detail, and legible mottoes help. Personal arms are strongest when documented to a known family, guild, or event.
• Maker and marks: Attributable maker’s touchmark and period retailer stamps add confidence and value. Unmarked plates are common but valued primarily on design and quality.
• Scale and presence: Larger diameters and deep modeling display well and typically command more.
• Condition and patina: Honest wear beats high polish. Old surface with deep gray, subtle highlights is ideal.
• Provenance and pairings: Documented provenance, original pairs or sets, and dates/initials tied to events (e.g., municipal jubilees) lift prices.

Broadly speaking, 19th‑century Belgian armorial plates occupy a middle tier of the pewter market: more sought after than plain service plates, typically less costly than early (17th–18th century) guild‑period pewter or documented presentation pieces. Exceptional relief, rare arms, and clear maker attribution are the usual standouts.

Care, Handling, and Display

• Cleaning: Use only mild, neutral‑pH soap with lukewarm water and a soft cloth. Rinse and dry immediately. Avoid soaking; never use abrasive pads, silver dips, or acidic cleaners.
• Polishing: Do not power‑buff. If you must improve appearance, use a microcrystalline wax sparingly to even sheen without stripping patina. In most cases, leave it be.
• Repairs: Have loose solder and cracks stabilized by a metals conservator familiar with historic pewter. Mismatched modern solders can discolor and reduce value.
• Display: Support the plate evenly. Use padded brackets or a plate stand with a deep foot support. Avoid direct sunlight, high humidity, and wood surfaces that off‑gas acids; a barrier layer (inert matboard) is wise.
• Storage: Wrap in acid‑free tissue; avoid PVC plastics. Keep in a stable, moderate environment.

A Practical Appraisal Checklist

• Measure and photograph front, back, rim, and foot ring; note diameter and profile.
• Document marks: clear, raking‑light photos of any touchmarks, inscriptions, retailer names, or numbers.
• Read the arms: identify charges, crowns, supporters, and motto language; note any dates/initials.
• Assess manufacture: turning lines, rim and booge form, foot ring, drilling for hanging.
• Evaluate surface: patina quality, over‑polishing, pitting, dents, solder repairs, warping.
• Cross‑check period clues: alloy marks (avoid “95%” for 19th‑century attributions), bilingual mottoes post‑1830, retailer locations, style of relief.
• Note provenance: invoices, family histories, or prior appraisals; pairings or sets.
• When uncertain, seek XRF alloy analysis and specialist opinion; avoid abrasive tests.

FAQ

Q: Is “coal of arm plate” the correct term? A: The correct term is “coat‑of‑arms plate.” “Coal of arm” is a frequent misreading or phonetic misspelling. Dealers and collectors will understand your meaning, but use “coat of arms” in formal descriptions.

Q: How can I tell pewter from Britannia metal or other alloys? A: Pewter (with some lead) is softer, duller in sheen, and gives a muted thud when tapped. Britannia metal is brighter, harder, and can “ring” a bit more. XRF testing can confirm alloy composition without damage.

Q: Are 19th‑century pewter plates safe to serve food on? A: It’s best to treat them as decorative. Historic pewter may contain lead; acidic foods can leach metal. For safety and preservation, avoid food contact.

Q: My plate says “ETAIN 95%.” Is it 19th century? A: Percentage purity marks like “ETAIN 95%” are generally a 20th‑century convention. While not impossible, such a mark usually indicates a later piece or a reproduction inspired by earlier styles.

Q: What’s the single most important factor in value? A: A combination of strong armorial imagery, original patina, and solid attribution (maker/retailer marks or documented provenance). Blurred relief and over‑polishing depress values more than minor rim dings.

With a disciplined eye for construction, marks, and heraldry, you can separate a genuine 19th‑century Belgian armorial plate from later look‑alikes and place it confidently within its historical context. That informed perspective is the foundation of sound appraisal and responsible collecting.